Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-09 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | -- |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a score of 80.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display and way less brightness. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a little better battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.