Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-09 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an overall score of 80.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 score. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite design is much newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite and Galaxy Note Fan Edition both have very similar processing units, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.