Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-09 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 80.6 against 80.1. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only a couple of months apart, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a lot lighter and way thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.