Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's global score of 80.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer cellphone, and it's also way thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a little worse screen density.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.