Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.09 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a global score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's overall score of 80.7. Xiaomi Mi Note 10's body is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better pixel count in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a much larger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.