Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-20 | -- |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.09 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a global score of 83.7 against 82.2. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a lot better performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a lot better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.