Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.09 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra, with an 83.7 score against 77. Xiaomi Mi Note 10's construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than HTC U Ultra. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra features a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel number per screen inch. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 75 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.