Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-11-20 | -- |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.09 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A34, having a overall score of 83.7 against 82.9. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A34 has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A34 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little worse pixel count per inch in the display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A34, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos, a much larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A34, because it has a 5260mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.