Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 377.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.09 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with an 83.7 score against 75.8. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 body is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite brighter display, a better display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 32 percent greater battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.