Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-11-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.09 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 83.7 against 80.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even when Xiaomi Mi Note 10 and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a couple of months difference, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.