Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.09 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, having a general score of 90.6 against 83.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 10, but it's also a lot heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.