Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with a general score of 80 against 76. The Google Pixel 3 design is newer and somewhat lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4070mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.