Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with an 81.9 score against 76. The Google Pixel 4 is a extremely newer and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, although it is also a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Pixel 4 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite greater pixels amount per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4070mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Google Pixel 4 takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.