Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with a overall score of 82.9 against 76. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a greater pixels number in each inch of display, a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Google Pixel 4 XL captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.