Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's general score of 76. The Google Pixel 4a body is extremely newer and lighter, but also a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. These devices use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite larger screen and a little higher pixel quantity per inch of screen. Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Google Pixel 4a's memory for games and applications is very similar to Xiaomi Mi Note 2's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.