Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, getting a score of 87.5 against 76. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a extremely newer phone than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but it's a bit thicker and a little heavier.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a just a little greater count of pixels in each inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger display. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a lot lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as Xiaomi Mi Note 2, both of them have equal internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4070mAh battery size against 3885mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.