Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having an 87.1 score against 76. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster). The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.