Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 516.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's global score of 76. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is a lot newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an older 15 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a much more mega pixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher video definition. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 384 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.