Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-11-01 | -- |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's general score of 76. Galaxy A34 is a a lot thinner and noticeably lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A34 has the previous 13 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy A34 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A34 captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bigger aperture, a back camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A34 has superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.