Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body has the same weight and thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2. The Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photographs, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera with more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.