Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-11-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's overall score of 76. Samsung Galaxy A70's design is way newer, but a bit thicker and a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 2. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a little higher pixels density. The Galaxy A70 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A70 also has 4 more CPU cores (although they are slower).
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 features a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A70 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.