Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, getting a 95.4 score against 76. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it's thicker and incredibly heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bigger screen, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 one, both have equal internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.