Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-01 | -- |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's general score of 76. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner device than Xiaomi Mi Note 2. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a higher pixels density, a larger display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations, a way bigger camera sensor, a lot better video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.