Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 516.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a score of 81 against 76. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is incredibly newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, although it's heavier and much thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little higher screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a much smaller sensor which offers a way worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a camera in the back with more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's battery life is just as good as Xiaomi Mi Note 2's battery lifetime, although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.