Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| $ 516.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, getting an 88.5 score against 76. Galaxy Z Flip's design is incredibly newer and just a little thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a bigger screen, a just a little higher display pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4070mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi Note 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.