Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 516.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 8.69 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a general score of 90.6 against 76. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a lot bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture and a back camera with a lot better 23 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.