Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's score of 75.3. The iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with Android 8.1 Oreo OS. Even though the iPhone 11 Pro Max is newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it is a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a bigger screen, a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen, more brightness and a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a camera with a 12 mega-pixels and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has better 60 fps video frame rate. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Mi Note 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.