Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with a score of 88.1 against 75.3. IPhone X is a just a bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but they are 0.3inches thick. IPhone X features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone X features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a just a bit better number of pixels per display inch, a little bigger screen and a bit brighter screen. The Apple iPhone X takes just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone X also has better video frame rates.
The Apple iPhone X has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Note 3, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.