Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having an 82 score against 75.3. Although the iPhone XR is newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than iPhone XR, because although it has less brightness and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
IPhone XR features a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a bit superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. The iPhone XR captures just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same resolution camera in the back and the same aperture, the iPhone XR also has higher video frame rates.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.