Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 general score. Google Pixel 2 XL is a just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a bit larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better screen pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a processing unit that is very similar to the processing unit in Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Google Pixel 2 XL and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 count with extremely similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. Google Pixel 2 XL has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 1 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.