Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 score. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a better pixels density, a little bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a back camera with more MP. Google Pixel 3 XL's battery performance is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 one, although the Google Pixel 3 XL has just 3430mAh of battery size against 3500mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.