Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a global score of 81.9 against 75.3. Google Pixel 4 is a extremely newer and just a little lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, although it's also a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a quite smaller screen. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Google Pixel 4 also has a back facing camera with more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.