Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's general score of 75.3. Google Pixel 5 is a way newer and just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it is just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 5 counts with as much memory for games and applications as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, they have equal internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Google Pixel 5 has longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 costs more money than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.