Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2017-09-12 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 EYEs is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a 76.9 score against 75.3. HTC U11 EYEs's design is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. The HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS, and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 comes with Android 8.1 Oreo OS.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a bit sharper display than HTC U11 EYEs, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, a little smaller display and a just a bit lower screen density.
HTC U11 EYEs has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 captures a little bit better photos and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
HTC U11 EYEs has a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.