Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 global score. Although the LG V35 ThinQ and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 were released only 9 months apart, the LG V35 ThinQ is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a little larger display, a greater screen density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. LG V35 ThinQ features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a little better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a back camera with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.