Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 global score. The LG V60 ThinQ design is noticeably newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, but it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a slightly better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. LG V60 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a camera with way more mega-pixels and a way higher video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.