Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's general score of 75.3. LG Velvet's design is way newer, but a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. The LG Velvet features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel count in each inch in the display. The LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity. LG Velvet counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.