Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting an 86.3 score against 75.3. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer phone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, although it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a lot larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.