Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's overall score of 75.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, although it's heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture, faster video frame rates and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.