Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 444.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, having a score of 87 against 75.3. Both phones we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is much newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) shoots greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Note 3, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.