Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 15 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 401 pixels per inch | -- |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's score of 75.3. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it's notably thinner and notably newer.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller screen and much darker display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a camera in the back with way more MP and a much better 7680x4320 video definition. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.