Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a 76.1 score against 75.3. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A22 has the older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy A22 design is incredibly newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a much better screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A22 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.