Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with a score of 79.9 against 75.3. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's construction is notably newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 3.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with way more brightness, a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels. Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.