Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's global score of 75.3. Although Galaxy A41 is a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it's a little bit lighter and much newer. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi Note 3 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A41, although it has a bit worse pixels density, a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A41 features a greater memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A41's battery lifetime is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.