Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's score of 75.3. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it is a little bit heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 and the Galaxy A50 both have quite similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A50 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A50, although it has a quite worse display pixel density, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger aperture for better low light captures and video and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.