Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is way better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, getting a 90.7 score against 75.3. Even though Galaxy A52 is extremely newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it's just a bit thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 and the Samsung Galaxy A52 have quite similar processors, both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A52, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, a bit less pixels per inch of display and a little smaller display. The Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.