Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 overall score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it's heavier and a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a little worse display pixels density and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G's processor is very similar to Xiaomi Mi Note 3's processor, both have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.