Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's 75.3 score. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a incredibly newer cellphone than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, but it is a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52s, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a just a little lower pixels number in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a lot better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52s features improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.