Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, with an 85.2 score against 75.3. Samsung Galaxy F41's design is notably newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 3's, but it's heavier and thicker. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little smaller screen, it also counts with more brightness. The Galaxy F41 has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 3. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a much more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.