Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.01 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| $ 444.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Note 3's global score of 75.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, it is extremely heavier and thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 3 has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a brighter display and a just a bit greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy F62's CPU is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although the Galaxy F62 has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have 6 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 3, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.